Improving the Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off: Mandatory Savings Accounts for Social Insurance
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the modern welfare state a substantial part of an individual’s tax bill is transferred back to the same individual taxpayer in the form of social transfers. This provides a rationale for financing part of social insurance through mandatory savings accounts. We analyze the behavioral and welfare effects of compulsory savings accounts in an intertemporal model with uncertainty, endogenous involuntary unemployment and retirement decisions, credit constraints, and heterogeneous agents. We show that the introduction of (early) retirement and unemployment accounts generates a Pareto improvement by enabling the government to provide lifetime income insurance and liquidity insurance in a more efficient manner. ∗) CentER, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands E-Mail: [email protected] ∗∗) Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Studiestraede 6, 1455 Copenhagen K, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] IMPROVING THE EQUITY-EFFICIENCY TRADE-OFF: MANDATORY SAVINGS ACCOUNTS FOR SOCIAL INSURANCE A. Lans Bovenberg and Peter Birch Sørensen
منابع مشابه
Social Insurance Based on Personal Savings Accounts: A possible reform strategy for overburdened welfare states?
In spite of some cutbacks in entitlements, many welfare states' spending has continuously increased over the past decades, leading to larger tax burdens and often higher marginal tax rates. Proposals for reform often focus on reduced social insurance benefits and more actuarial insurance premia. In this paper it is shown that such reforms may have a smaller potential for reducing the marginal t...
متن کاملPolicy Choices for Progressive Realization of Universal Health Coverage; Comment on “Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage”
In responses to Norheim’s editorial, this commentary offers reflections from Thailand, how the five unacceptable trade-offs were applied to the universal health coverage (UHC) reforms between 1975 and 2002 when the whole 64 million people were covered by one of the three public health insurance systems. This commentary aims to generate global discussions on how best UHC can be gradually achieve...
متن کاملChoice-Consistent Resolutions of the Efficiency-Equity Trade-Off
In a standard framework of choice theory, we formulate two contrasting principles for social choice under the efficiency-equity trade-off. The equity-first principle states that we should select from equitable allocations if any, but if the equity criterion is not at all effective for selection either because all the available allocations are equitable or because no allocation is equitable, we ...
متن کاملAn Evaluation of Social Insurance Savings Accounts
Many countries have reformed, or plan to reform, their pension system, often replacing defined benefits with some sort of savings account. In recent years proposals have been made to apply personal savings accounts also to other elements of social insurance, such as unemployment insurance, social assistance or parental leave compensation. This paper evaluates the consequences of replacing these...
متن کاملRisk Classification and Health Insurance
Risk classification refers to the use of observable characteristics by insurers to group individuals with similar expected claims, compute the corresponding premiums, and thereby reduce asymmetric information. An efficient risk classification system generates premiums that fully reflect the expected cost associated with each class of risk characteristics. This is known as financial equity. In t...
متن کامل